Wikimedia Voters Support Ban on Crypto Donations
Key Takeaways
- Wikimedia voters expressed overwhelming opposition to crypto donations in a vote that concluded this week.
- Concerns were raised around the environmental impact of crypto mining and implicit support for crypto projects.
- Wikimedia has not said whether it will end crypto donations, but has said that very little of its revenue comes from crypto.
Share this article
Contributors to Wikimedia have overwhelmingly voted that the project’s foundation should stop accepting cryptocurrency.
71% of Voters Oppose Crypto Donation
Wikimedia could soon end support for cryptocurrency donations if its foundation complies with the requests of its community.
One page on the site indicates that 71% of 326 voters expressed support for ending cryptocurrency donations.
Those in favor of ending cryptocurrency donation expressed concerns around the environmental impact of mining, as well as concerns around the implicit endorsement of cryptocurrencies.
Those who supported the continued acceptance of cryptocurrency argued that proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies demand little energy. It was also said that cryptocurrencies provide “safer ways to donate and engage in finance for people in oppressive countries.”
The vote and request for comments on crypto donations began on Jan. 10 and closed on Apr. 12. It took place roughly eight years after Wikimedia first began to accept crypto in 2014.
The Wikimedia Foundation has not made it clear whether it will comply with the request. It did, however, say that cryptocurrency is a very minor part of its funding. Last year, it received $130,100 in crypto from 347 donors, making up just 0.08% of its revenue.
Crypto In the Open Culture Movement
Wikimedia is an umbrella project consisting of sites such as Wikipedia, Wiktionary, MediaWiki, and Wikinews.
Despite a lack of community support, Wikimedia’s founders have shown interest in crypto. In 2021, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales auctioned an NFT to raise funds for his alternative social media site.
Meanwhile, Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger went on to found Everipedia, a blockchain-based encyclopedia forked from Wikipedia. Sanger later resigned as CTO of that project in 2019.
Wikimedia should not be confused with the unrelated whistleblower site Wikileaks. In addition to regular donations, that community raised $41 million of cryptocurrency for Julian Assange this year.
Elsewhere in the open-culture movement, the Mozilla Foundation has experienced backlash for accepting crypto donations. Last week, it announced that it would accept proof-of-stake coins while rejecting mining-based cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.
Wikimedia Foundation did not immediately respond to Crypto Briefing‘s request for comment.
Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and other cryptocurrencies.
Share this article
Get up to $600 in AVAX or LUNA
With our goal of bringing the next 100 million people to crypto, Celsius is always looking to provide the best experiences and opportunities for our community. This includes looking for…
Opinion: Why Won’t Wikipedia Classify NFTs as Art?
Wikipedia doesn’t want to acknowledge NFTs as art. Join Crypto Briefing as we dive into the reasons behind the controversial decision and the reactions and counterarguments from the NFT community. …
Jimmy Wales Will Auction First Wikipedia Edit As NFT
Wikipedia founder Jimmy “Jimbo” Wales is auctioning his first-ever site edit as a non-fungible token or NFT. NFT Features Wikipedia Snapshot Though the NFT is advertised as containing Wales’ first…
Tim Berners-Lee to Auction WWW Source Code as NFT
Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, will auction his original source code as a non-fungible token (NFT) via Sotheby’s. Tokenized Source Code Lee submitted a proposal for the…
Leave a Reply